翻訳と辞書 |
Dangerfield v. Secretary of State : ウィキペディア英語版 | Dangerfield v. Secretary of State
''Dangerfield v. Secretary of State'', Dallam 592 (1844), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the Republic of Texas which held that the President does not have the authority to appoint the county court chief justice, the Texas Congress established the process to fill the office by Congressional election. The Court issued a writ of mandamus to settle the dispute. == Background == The dispute centered on whether the President of the Republic had the right to appoint the chief justice of the county courts, or whether the Texas Congress had the right to elect the justices.〔''Dangerfield v. Secretary of State'', Dallam 358 (1840); David P. Currie, ''Article: The Constitution of the Republic of Texas: Part 2 OF 2: The Decisions'', 8 239 (2005).〕 While the Texas Constitution mentioned that there was to be a court in every county, it did not mention county court judges.〔Currie, at 240.〕 That office was created by statute.〔Currie, at 240-41.〕
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)』 ■ウィキペディアで「Dangerfield v. Secretary of State」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|